House Republicans accused Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chairman Gary Gensler of being overly aggressive in his enforcement actions against the digital asset industry while failing to clearly state which digital assets are under the SEC’s jurisdiction.
During the hearing on April 18, Rep. Patrick McHenry brought attention to the lack of clarity in digital assets regulation, criticizing the commission’s regulation by enforcement approach.
McHenry – along with other Republican lawmakers such as Reps. French Hill and Bill Huizenga – criticized Gensler for his regulatory approach – arguing that he placed too much emphasis on enforcement rather than providing clear guidelines for the cryptocurrency industry.
Additionally, they accused Gary Gensler of hindering their efforts to investigate his handling of the FTX incident.
Is Ether a commodity or a security?
McHenry repeatedly interrupted Gensler’s responses, pointing to the SEC chair’s classification of Bitcoin as a commodity.
McHenry also hinted at private discussions on Ether prior to the hearing, highlighting the ongoing debate and uncertainty surrounding digital asset regulation in the United States.
Specifically, the congressman asked whether the digital asset should be classified as a security under the SEC’s jurisdiction or a commodity under the Commodity Future Trading Commission’s (CFTC) purview. Despite being pressed, Gensler chose not to provide detailed information on any particular token.
He argued that the securities laws already provide a clear framework for determining whether a financial instrument should be classified as a security.
House Committee blasts Gary Gensler and SEC
The House Committee on Financial Services has also sent a scathing letter to SEC Chair Gary Gensler, accusing him of having a hypocritical stance on digital asset regulation.
The letter takes issue with Gensler’s recent comments about firms needing to “come in and register” with the SEC, citing a lack of clear regulatory guidelines.
The committee argues that Gensler’s push for registration is a “willful misrepresentation” of the SEC’s nonexistent registration process, adding to the growing debate on the need for clear regulatory guidelines for digital assets in the United States.
The letter reads:
“To date, the SEC has forced digital asset market participants into regulatory frameworks that are neither compatible with the underlying technology nor applicable because the firms’ activities do not involve an offering of securities.”
The committee also argues that many digital assets are designed for non-securities transactions and are meant to be used within a specific protocol, which is not currently contemplated under existing regulations.
As a result, the lack of clarity is causing confusion and uncertainty in the industry. The committee urged Gensler to partner with Congress in creating explicit and unambiguous legislation that establishes clear-cut guidelines for digital asset regulation.
The post House Committee slams SEC Chair Gary Gensler over inconsistent approach to crypto regulation appeared first on CryptoSlate.
Credit: Source link
